If power implies victory in war, then weak actors should almost never win against stronger opponents, especially when the gap in relative power is very large.
Yet history suggests otherwise: Weak actors sometimes do win.The question is how.
Hypothesis 1: When strong actors attack using a direct strategy and weak actors defend using a direct strategy, all other things being equal, strong actors should win quickly and decisively
Hypothesis 2: When strong actors attack with a direct strategy and weak actors defend using an indirect strategy, all other things being equal, weak actors should win
Hypothesis 3: When strong actors attack using an indirect strategy and weak actors defend using a direct strategy, all other things being equal, strong actors should lose
Hypothesis 4: When strong actors employ barbarism to attack weak actors defending with a Guerrilla Warfare Strategy, all other things being equal, strong actors should win
Comments
gray hair remedy